TEXTUAL TRANSFORMATION OF CONFUCIAN CANONICAL LITERATURE: FROM THE STABILITY OF THE CLASSICS TO THE DYNAMISM OF COMMENTARIES
Abstract
The article offers a comprehensive philological analysis of Confucian canonical literature as a specific textual system that combines a high degree of stability of the canonical corpus with the historical dynamism of the commentary tradition. The object of the study is the corpus of the “Thirteen Classics” (十三经), which was formed through a long historical process and for centuries functioned as a normative foundation of China’s intellectual, ethical, and educational culture. The main focus is placed on the mechanisms of interpretation of the Classics as realized through the system of commentaries (注), subcommentaries (疏), phonetic-semantic glosses (音义), and their various textual combinations within canonical–commentarial editions. It is demonstrated that the textual fixity of the Classics does not imply semantic immobility: the historical vitality of the Confucian tradition was ensured precisely by the development of commentarial practices, which performed the function of adapting canonical texts to changing intellectual, social, and cultural contexts. The study traces the evolution of major types of commentaries, from early “ancient annotations” (古注) to the system of officially sanctioned Correct Meanings (正义) and the later philological scholarship of the Qing period. Particular attention is paid to the methodological differences between the Han Learning (汉学) and Song Learning (宋学) traditions, which represent distinct strategies of engaging with canonical texts. The results of the research substantiate the thesis that textual transformation within the Confucian tradition occurred not through modification of the canonical texts themselves, but through the accumulation and reinterpretation of successive layers of commentary. This approach makes it possible to conceptualize Confucian Classics and their commentaries as mutually dependent elements of a single yet internally dynamic textual complex, a perspective that is of particular relevance for contemporary philological and Sinological studies.
References
2. Elman B. From philosophy to philology: Intellectual and social aspects of change in late imperial China. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Asia Center, 2001. 368 p.
3. Goldin P. Confucianism. London ; New York : Routledge, 2011. 240 p.
4. Henderson J. Scripture, canon, and commentary: A comparison of Confucian and Western exegesis. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1991. 247 p.
5. Ivanhoe J. Confucian moral self-cultivation. Indianapolis : Hackett Publishing Company, 2017. 152 p.
6. Lewis E. Writing and authority in early China. Albany : State University of New York Press, 1999. 544 p.
7. Nylan M. The five “Confucian” classics. New Haven ; London : Yale University Press, 2001. 416 p.
8. 冯友兰. 中国哲学史. 重庆 : 重庆出版社, 2009. 415 页.
9. 葛兆光. 中国思想史. 上海 : 复旦大学出版 社, 2011. 356 页.
10. 李安宅. 《仪礼》与《礼记》之社会学的研 究. 上海 : 上海人民出版社, 2005. 225 页.
11. 钱穆. 中国经学史. 北京 : 商务印书馆, 1996. 604 页.
12. 王冉冉. 史记讲读. 上海 : 华东师范大学出 版社, 2020. 360 页.
13. 王记录, 李艳. 汉学、宋学和清代史学. 山 西师大学报:社会科学版. 2005. 第 32 卷, 第 1 期. 页 25–32.
14. 杨德春. 论《春秋谷梁传》的产生与成书先 于《春秋公羊传》. 辽东学院学报:社会科 学版. 2011. 第 13 卷, 第 3 期. 页 36–49.
15. 杨柳. 《后汉书》李贤注文字训诂研究 : 博 士论文. 上海 : 复旦大学, 2008. 380 页.
16. 朱汉民. 朱熹《四书》学与儒家工夫论. 北 京大学学报:哲学社会科学版. 2005. 第 42 卷, 第 1 期. 页 42–52.
17. 陈来. 宋明理学. 北京 : 北京大学出版社, 2004. 410 页.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN 
.png)



